Log Search Results

14 June 1859. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  P.M.—To Flint’s Pond.

  Early strawberries begin to be common. The lower leaves of the plant are red, concealing the fruit. Violets, especially of dry land, are scarce now . . .

(Journal, 12:202-203)
14 June 1860. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  I see near at hand two of those large yellow (and black) butterflies which I have probably seen nearly a month. They rest on the mud near a brook . . .

  P.M.—To Second Division . . . (Journal, 13:351-353).

14 June 1861. St. Anthony, Minn.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  Leave Mrs. Hamilton’s at 12 ½ p.m. . . .

  Dr. [Charles L.] A[nderson] said that the anthers of the swamp vaccinium were awned. I find them not so—& the styles hairy—which would put it with the uliginosum!! section. He has a rattlesnake—another much larger light brown snake found on the prairie (Thoreau’s Minnesota Journey, 18-19).

Concord, Mass. Mary Mann writes to her son Horace Mann Jr.:

  Mrs. [Cynthia Dunbar] Thoreau called this morning to say she had heard from Mr. T. again. It was delightful to his mother to hear that Mr. T. has been swimming. He tells her that he does not pay any attention to his health, though he feels weak . . .

  He tells his mother that you and he are having a fine time.

(The Correspondence of Henry David Thoreau, 618)

Concord, Mass. A. Bronson Alcott writes in his journal:

  Call again to inquire about Henry. He is still near St. Paul, and writes that he is finding some new plants in those parts and enjoying the freedom of the country house and wild life where he is staying, but says nothing concerning his health, from which we infer a change for the better.

  The West opens a new field for his observations; and to one whose everyday walk was an expedition into some unexplored region of Concord in search of novelties, though his track had been taken but yesterday, that wilderness must have surprising attractions . . .

  I know not to whom that wild country belongs if not to this old explorer, and think it has waited with an Amazonian patience for his arrival . . . his visit must have been predestined from the beginning, and this lassitude of these late months only the intimation of his having exhausted these old fields and farms of Concord of the significance they had for him.

(The Journals of Bronson Alcott, 340)
14 March 1835. Cambridge, Mass.

Thoreau finishes the second term of his sophomore year, ranking seventh in a class of 44 students. He earned 1,538 points, for a grand total of 7,744. Starts his third term, taking the following classes:

  • Mathematics taught by Benjamin Peirce; reading An Elementary Treatise on Mechanics by John Farrar
  • Greek composition, grammar, and antiquities taught by Cornelius C. Felton; reading Euripides’ Alcestis
  • Latin composition taught by Charles Beck; reading Seneca’s Medea and Horace’s epistles and satires
  • English taught by Edward T. Channing with weekly declamation and bi-weekly themes; reading Richard Whately’s Logic
  • French taught by Francis Surault
(Thoreau’s Harvard Years, part 1:15-16)
14 March 1838. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal to prepare a lecture at the Concord Lyceum on 11 April.

SCRAPS FROM A LECTURE ON “SOCIETY” WRITTEN MARCH 14TH, 1838, DELIVERED BEFORE OUR LYCEUM, APRIL 11TH

  Every proverb in the newspapers originally stood for a truth. Thus the proverb that man was made for society, so long as it was not allowed to conflict with another important truth, deceived no one; but, now that the same words have come to stand for another thing, it maybe for a lie, we are obliged, in order to preserve its significance, to write it anew, so that properly it will read, Society was made for man . . .

  Let not society be the element in which you swim, or are tossed about at the mercy of the waves, but be rather a strip of firm land running out into the sea, whose base is daily washed by the tide, but whose summit only the spring tide can reach . . .

(Journal, 1:36-40)
14 March 1842. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  It is not easy to find one brave enough to play the game of love quite alone with you, but they must get some third person, or world, to countenance them. They thrust others between. Love is so delicate and fastidious that I see not how [it]can ever begin. Do you expect me to love with you, unless you make my love secondary to nothing else? Your words come tainted, if the thought of the world darted between thee and the thought of me. You are not venturous enough for love. It goes alone unscared through wildernesses.
(Journal, 1:328-330)

Thoreau also writes to Isaiah Thornton Williams:

Dear Williams,

  I meant to write to you before but John’s [John Thoreau Jr.] death and my own sickness, with other circumstances, prevented. John died of the lock-jaw, as you know, Jan. 11th I have been confined to my chamber for a month with a prolonged shock of the same disorder—from close attention to, and sympathy with him, which I learn is not without precedent. Mr. Emerson [Ralph Waldo Emerson] too has lost his oldest child, Waldo, by scarlet fever, a boy of rare promise, who in the expectation of many was to be one of the lights of his generation.

  John was sick but three days from the slightest apparent cause—an insignificant cut on his finger, which gave him no pain, and was more than a week old—but nature does not ask for such causes as man expects—when she is ready there will be cause enough. I mean simply that perhaps we never assign the sufficient cause for anything—though it undoubtedly exists. He was perfectly calm, ever pleasant while reason lasted, and gleams of the same serenity and playfulness shone through his delirium to the last. But I will not disturb his memory. If you knew him, I could not add to your knowledge, and if you did not know him, as I think you could not, it is now too late, and no eulogy of mine would suffice—For my own part I feel that I could not have done without this experience.

  What you express with regard to the effect of time on our youthful feelings—which indeed is the theme of universal elegy—reminds me of some verses of Byron—quite rare to find in him, and of his best I think. Probably you remember them.

“No more, not more! Oh never more on me
The freshness of the heart can fall like dew
Which out of all the lovely things we see,
Extracts emotions beautiful and new,
Hived in our bosoms like the bag o’the bee,
Think’st thou the honey with these objects grew
Alas! ‘Twas not in them, but in thy power,
To double even the sweetness of a flower.

No more, no more! Oh! never more, my heart!
Cans’t thou be my sole world, my universe
Once all in all, but now a thing apart,
Thou canst not be my blessing, or my curse;
The illusion’s gone forever—”

  I would be well if we could add new years to our lives as innocently as the fish adds new layers to its shell—no less beautiful than the old. And I believe we may if we will replace the vigor and elasticity of youth with faithfulness in later years.

  When I consider the universe I am still the youngest born. We do not grow old we rust old. Let us not consent to be old, but to die (live?) rather. Is Truth old? or Virtue—or Faith? If we possess them they will be our elixir vitæ and fount of Youth. It is at least good to remember our innocence; what we regret is not quite lost — Earth sends no sweeter strain to Heaven than this plaint. Could we not grieve perpetually, and by our grief discourage time’s encroachments? All our sin too shall be welcome for such is the material of Wisdom, and through her is our redemption to come.

  ’Tis true, as you say, “Man’s ends are shaped for him,” but who ever dared confess the extent of his free agency? Though I am weak, I am strong too. If God shapes my ends—he shapes me also—and his means are always equal to his ends. His work does not lack this completeness, that the creature consents. I am my destiny. Was I ever in that straight that it was not sweet to do right? And then for this free agency I would not be free of God certainly—I would only have freedom to defer to him He has not made us solitary agents. He has not made us to do without him Though we must “abide our destiny,” will not he abide it with us? So do the stars and the flowers. My destiny is now arrived—is now arriving. I believe that what I call my circumstances will be a very true history of myself—for God’s works are complete both within and without—and shall I not be content with his success? I welcome my fate for it is not trivial nor whimsical. Is there not a soul in circumstances?—and the disposition of the soul to circumstances—is not that the crowning circumstance of all? But after all it is intra-stances, or how it stands within me that I am concerned about. Moreover circumstances are past, but I am to come, that is to say, they are results of me—but I have not yet arrived at my result.

  All impulse, too, is primarily from within The soul which does shape the world is within and central.

  I must confess I am apt to consider the trades and professions so many traps which the Devil sets to catch men in — and good luck he has too, if one may judge. But did it ever occur that a man came to want, or the almshouse from consulting his higher instincts? All great good is very present and urgent, and need not be postponed. What did Homer—and Socrates—and Christ and [William] Shakspeare & [George] Fox? Did they have to compound for their leisure, or steal their hours? What a curse would civilization be if it thus ate into the substance of the soul—Who would choose rather the simple grandeur of savage life for the solid leisure it affords? But need we sell our birthright for a mess of pottage? Let us trust that we shall be fed as the sparrows are.

  “Grass and earth to sit on, water to wash the feet, and fourthly, affectionate speech are at no time deficient in the mansions of the good”

  You may be interested to learn that Mr. Alcott [Amos Bronson Alcott] is going to England in April.

  That you may find in Law the profession you love, and the means of spiritual culture, is the wish of your friend

Henry D. Thoreau.

(The Correspondence of Henry David Thoreau, 66-68; MS missing, copy in Henry David Thoreau papers (Series III). Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection of English and American Literature, New York Public Library)
14 March 1848. Concord, Mass.

Bronson Alcott writes in his journal:

  I asked Thoreau if it were not proof of our inefficiency that we had not as yet attracted some fine soul, some maid from the farmer’s hearth or youth from farm or workshop, to our houses, and found a proof undeniable of having a positive and real existence here in this world, in this 19th century, in this winter of 1848, in this little centre of Concord, Mass.
(The Journals of Bronson Alcott, 204)
14 March 1849. Boston, Mass.

The Daily Evening Traveller notes Thoreau’s Salem, Mass. lectures: “a delectable compound of oddity, wit and transcendentalism, from Mr. Thoreau, of Concord” (Studies in the American Renaissance, 1995, 167).

14 March 1852. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  Rain, rain, rain; but even this is fair weather after so much snow. The ice on Walden has now for some days looked like snow, the surface being softened by the sun . . . (Journal, 3:350).
14 March 1853. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  P.M.—Repairing my boat . . . Lowell Fay tells me that he overtook with a boat and killed last July a woodchuck which was crossing the river at Hollowell Place. He also says that the blacksmith of Sudbury has two otter skins taken in that town.
(Journal, 5:20)

Return to the Log Index

Donation

$