Log Search Results

17 August 1852. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  Twenty minutes before 5 A.M.—To Cliffs and Walden.

  Dawn. No breathing of chip-birds nor singing of robins as in spring, hut still the cock crows lustily. The creak of crickets sounds louder. As I go along the back road, hear two or three song sparrows. This morning’s red, there being a misty cloud there, is equal to an evening red. The woods are very still . . .

(Journal, 4:298-299)
17 August 1853. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  Rain in forenoon.

  The high blackberries are now in their prime; the richest berry we have. That wild black currant by Union Turnpike ripe (in gardens some time). The knapweed now conspicuous, like a small thistle . . .

(Journal, 5:377)
17 August 1854. Worcester, Mass.

Walden is reviewed in the Daily Transcript.

17 August 1855. New York, N.Y.

Horace Greeley writes to Thoreau:

Friend Thoreau,

  There is a very small class in England who ought to know what you have written, and for whose sake I want a few copies of “Walden” sent to certain periodicals over the water—for instance, to

Westminster Review,
8 King Wm. St. Strand London.
The Reasoner, 147 Fleet St. London
Gerald Massey, office of The News
Edinburgh.
—Willy, Esq. of
Dickens’s Household Words,
Fleet. St. London

  I feel sure your publishers would not throw away copies sent to these periodicals; especially if your “Week on the Concord and Merrimac[k]” could accompany them. Chapman, Ed Westminster Rev. expressed surprise to me that your book had not been sent him, and I could find very few who had read or seen it. If a new edition should be called for, try to have it better known in Europe; but have a few copies sent to those worthy of it at all events.

Yours,
Horace Greeley

“Thoreau took Greeley’s advice and a review of Walden by no less a person than George Eliot appeared in the Westminster Review.”

(The Correspondence of Henry David Thoreau, 380)
17 August 1856. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  P.M.—Walked with Minot Pratt behind his house . . .

  It is then red with a white check, often slightly pear-shaped, semitransparent with a lustre, very finely and indistinctly white-dotted . . . (Journal, 9:6-8).

17 August 1857. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes to Marston Watson:

Mr. Watson,

  I am much indebted to you for your glowing communication of July 20th. I had that very day left Concord for the wilds of Maine; but when I returned, August 8th, two out of the six worms remained nearly, if not quite, as bright as at first, I was assured. In their best estate they had excited the admiration of many of the inhabitants of Concord. It was a singular coincidence that I should find these worms awaiting me, for my mind was full of a phosphorescence which I had seen in the woods. I have waited to learn something more about them before acknowledging the receipt of them. I have frequently met with glow-worms in my night walks, but am not sure they were the same kind with these. Dr. [Thaddeus] Harris once describe to me a larger kind than I had found “nearly as bug as your little finger”; but he does not name them in his report.

  The only authorities on Glow-worms which I chance to have (and I am pretty well provided), are Kirby and Spence (the fullest), Knapp (“Journal of a Naturalist”), “The Library of Entertaining Knowledge” (Rennie), a French work, etc., et., but there is no minute, scientific description on any of these. This is apparently female of the genus Lampyris; but Kirby and Spence say that there are nearly two hundred species of this genus alone. The one commonly referred to by English writers is the Lampyris noctiluca; but judging from Kirby and Spence’s description, and from the description and plate in the French work, this is not that one, for besides other differences both say that the light proceeds from the abdomen. Perhaps the worms exhibited by Durkee (whose statement to the Boston Society of Natural History, second July meeting, in the Traveller” of August 12, 1857, I send you) were the same with these. I do not see how they could be the L. noctiluca, as he states.

  I expect to go to Cambridge before long, and if I get any more light on this subject I will inform you. The two worms are still alive.

  I shall be glad to receive the Drosera at any time, if you chance to come across it. I am looking over Loudon’s “Arboretum,” which we have added to our Library, and it occurs to me that it was written expressly for you, and that you cannot avoid placing it on your own shelves.

  I should have been glad to see the whale, and might perhaps have done so, if I had not at that time been seeing “the elephant” (or moose) in the Maine woods. I have been associating for about a month with one Joseph Polis, the chief man of the Penobscot tribe of Indians, and have learned a great deal from him, which I should like to tell you sometime.

(The Correspondence of Henry David Thoreau, 487-488)
17 August 1858. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  Minott has only lately been reading Shattuck’s “History of Concord,” and he says that his account is not right by a jugful, that he does not come within half a mile of the truth, not as he has heard tell . . .

  C. [William Ellery Channing] saw pigeons to-day.

  P. M.—To Annursnack via swimming-ford . . .

(Journal, 11:110-111)
17 August 1859.

Lincoln, Mass. Thoreau surveys land for Rufus Morse (A Catalog of Thoreau’s Surveys in the Concord Free Public Library, 10; Henry David Thoreau papers. Special Collections, Concord (Mass.) Free Public Library).

Concord, Mass. Thoreau also writes in his journal:

  Frost in low ground this morning . . . (Journal, 12:287-288).
17 August 1860. Concord, Mass.

Thoreau writes in his journal:

  See at Pout’s Nest two solitary tattlers, as I have seen them about the muddy shore of Gourgas Pond-hole and in the Great Meadow pools . . . (Journal, 14:54).
17 December 1829. Concord, Mass.

Henry D. Thoreau is chosen to act as secretary pro-tempore at a meeting of the Concord Academy Debating Society. The minutes state:

  The Secretary being absent, Henry Thoreau was chosen Sec. pro. tem. and he neglecting to perform his duty by recording the proceedings, it falls to the lot of the Sec. to record, by hearsay, what was done. The Society came together at the usual time, and the question selected last evening, “Do children imitate, imbibe or adopt virtues as soon as vices?” was taken up by the disputants, and left to be discussed again and decided at some future time.
(Emerson Society Quarterly 9 (4th quarter 1957):7-8)

Return to the Log Index

Donation

$